Yeah and Hawaiians don’t get royalties on flowery beachwear either. The person who makes the money is the one that spots that people like certain styles then invests a shedload of money on the basis of those skills in creating actual items that people actually buy.
Now if Native Americans could or would do that then they could even make money out of other people’s styles.
The companies that actually create the fashion items do not deny access to native Americans they simply go to professional designers that can do the job first time quickly to spec and understand that the garment also needs to be manufactured to a price point so their design needs to work on a myriad of levels. It just ain’t that simple. It’s the reason why fashion companies stick with pro designers rather than amateurs withe a specific ethnicity. It’s called business.
and
Cultures interact, change and borrow from each other. To decide that some of this is “off-limits”… Well, who decides? By what right? Why should anyone take notice? I loathe the Walter-Scott-land travesty of Highland dress that can be seen here; I dislike the imposition of this shortbread-tin bogus culture on the whole of Scotland, never mind the Highlands; but it exists, and there’s nothing one can do about it. A student mag here was more concerned with ‘cultural appropriation’ re: Native American and other tribal jewellery & c. than with what’s under their noses. In the end, all that matters is whether it’s tasteful, and if you don’t like it, you don’t need to play along with it.
and
‘Restricted symbols’? Sorry, no. In art, there should be no ‘restricted symbols’. No art-police, thank you.
etc
Sorry, Social Justice police, even in the most wet, left wing, social justicey paper in the UK, no one has time for your attempts to suppress freedom of expression. Whine all you want, but no one cares. Goodbye!
That embarrassing moment when you’re reporting these comments for any reason other than to laugh at them.



